Two more letters

I can’t help feeling that I was a little unfair to Douglas Hofstadter in my last post, so as these were hypothetical letters, I will travel back in time, and send two more, enquiring whether a reductionist or a holistic approach is the better way to approach questions of Life, the Universe and Everything. Here is the text of both hypothetical letters:

Most Excellent Wordsmith,

Holism or reductionism?

Master of the (not (just) an) Excel WordPress-blog

On this occaision I suspect that Douglas Adams would have decided to answer the question in the form of a full length book, called The Trout of Indecision, but being unable to decide whether it should be yet another addition to the Hitchhiker’s Trilogy (with the theme of not being able to see the school for all the fish), or a Dirk Gently story (with the theme that there are interconnections between all things, but some interconnections are much more interesting than others), he would miss deadline after deadline, until sadly and finally being swept up by the final deadline that comes to us all.

Douglas Hofstadter on the other hand would reply promptly with a single two letter word:

clearly intended to be read three times, the first and last as a phonetic contraction of the TLA, MEW, but what is the meaning of the body of the letter?

Fortunately my imaginary infinite resolution monitor works well on hypothetical documents, and I am able to zoom in on MU, and sharpen it, revealing:

We can now see that the M is made up of three copies of the word “HOLISM”, and the U by the word “REDUCTIONISM”, and if we zoom still further, we see that:

each letter of “HOLISM” is made up of the word “REDUCTIONISM”, and that:

each letter of reductionism is made up of the word “HOLISM”.  And if we zoom still further we see that:

each letter of the smaller words is made up of multiple copies of the word:

…  and so on.

All images in this post are based on the original from Douglas Hofstadter’s “Godel, Escher Bach

Some nice links about Godel, Escher, Bach, and Godel, Escher, Bach can be found at: Godel, Escher, Bach

This entry was posted in Newton and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Two more letters

  1. Pingback: “Yields circularity when preceded by its quoation” … | Newton Excel Bach, not (just) an Excel Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.