The previous post in this series provided Excel User Defined Functions (UDFs) to find the strain in a concrete section due to unrestrained creep and shrinkage. In this post the effect of restraint of the creep and shrinkage strains by the section reinforcing steel will be discussed, and in the following post a UDF will be presented that allows the stresses and strains in the section to be calculated allowing for creep and shrinkage strains and variation in the applied load and prestress over time.

Both shrinkage and creep result in a shrinkage strain in the concrete, with no change in stress for an unrestrained section, but for a reinforced section the reinforcement partially restrains the concrete strain, resulting in a transfer of compressive stress from the concrete to the reinforcement for zones in compression, or an increase in the tensile stress in the concrete for uncracked zones in tension.

A simple way to visualise the effect of shrinkage on the strains and stresses in a reinforced section is to apply an imaginary external compressive axial force to the reinforcement, so that it follows the unrestrained shrinkage strain of the concrete, with no change to the concrete stress. If the external force is then removed the state of stress and strain in the section will be the same as for a section that has undergone shrinkage with no change to the external loads (except for the effects of creep, which will be discussed later). This analysis is illustrated below:

Note that:

- For an uncracked section with symmetrical reinforcement the shrinkage strain does not affect the curvature of the section.
- For a cracked section there is a significant change in curvature due to shrinkage strains, even for symmetrical reinforcement.
- The restraint of the shrinkage strain causes a significant increase in the tensile stress in the concrete, which results in a reduction of the cracking moment.
- The effect of shrinkage may be analysed by applying a compressive prestress to the reinforcement, equal to the free concrete strain multiplied by the reinforcement elastic modulus.
- The change in stress in the concrete due to shrinkage is reduced by the effects of creep. Analysis of this effect is discussed below.

Creep is the increase over time of strain due to applied load. Creep typically increases the strain in the concrete by a factor of the order of 3, and must therefore be considered in assessment of the long term behaviour of concrete structures. The reinforcing steel is also subject to creep strains, but at typical reinforcement stresses the effects are negligible (except for prestressed reinforcement, where the relaxation of prestress due to creep must be considered). Since shrinkage results in a change of stress in the concrete, this interacts with creep effects.

The effect of creep strains could in principle be analysed in the same way as shrinkage, by the application of a virtual prestress to the reinforcement, but since the magnitude of the creep strain is proportional to the stress in the concrete, the magnitude of the virtual prestress is dependent on the stress in the concrete after completion of creep, so an iterative procedure would be required to find the correct level of prestress. A simpler approach is to use an “age adjusted modulus” for the concrete, so that the analysed strain in the concrete includes both elastic and creep strains. For a creep coefficient of Ø the age adjusted modulus is given by E_{t} / (1+ Ø), where E_{t} is the elastic modulus of the concrete at the time of loading.

Having found the concrete stresses after creep using the age adjusted modulus method, it is possible to find the equivalent virtual prestress that will result in the same stresses and curvature in the section. The virtual prestress for creep is given by E_{s} e_{c} Ø / (1+ Ø), where E_{s} is the elastic modulus of the reinforcing steel, and e_{c }is the total strain in the concrete at the level of the reinforcement, as determined by the age adjusted modulus method. This prestress is then applied in conjunction with the unreduced concrete modulus, giving exactly the same end results for stresses in the concrete and reinforcement, and strains in the reinforcement. Examples of these methods of calculating creep strains are shown below:

To combine creep and shrinkage effects, a simple method that is satisfactory for many purposes is to use the age adjusted modulus method for creep, and the virtual prestress method for shrinkage. Whilst this method will usually give a result within the order of accuracy of standard materials properties, it does introduce several avoidable inaccuracies:

- It does not take account of the variation of creep stresses over time.
- It does not take account of the interaction between shrinkage stresses and creep strains.
- If shrinkage results in the section transitioning from an uncracked to a cracked state at some time after initial loading, the initial stress and strain conditions will be very different to those assumed, and this may introduce significant inaccuracies.
- If the loading and/or prestress applied to the section changes significantly over time it is not possible to take account of these changes in the simple analysis.

All of these factors can be included in a time step analysis as described below:

- Set up a table of logarithmic time steps, with shrinkage strain and creep factor for each time step. Optionally add changes to applied loads, and changes to prestress loads.
- Analyse the strains and stresses in the section at the end of the first time step, using the virtual prestress method for shrinkage and the age adjusted modulus method for creep.
- For each succeeding time step add creep strains from the previous stages to the cumulative shrinkage strain for calculation of the virtual prestress. Find the creep strain increment using the age adjusted modulus, using the increment in the Ø value, and adjust applied loads and applied prestress where applicable.

A spreadsheet performing this analysis, with examples based on real projects, will be included in the next post in this series.

Pingback: Reinforced Concrete Moment-Curvature – 4; Development of curvature over time « Newton Excel Bach, not (just) an Excel Blog

bonjour

je veux methode 3 moment dans le fortran

merci

LikeLike

Toaria – I don’t have any plans to transfer any of this to Fortran in the forseeable future, but the functions work reasonably quickly in VBA!

LikeLike

Pingback: Lateral pile analyis with PY curves … « Newton Excel Bach, not (just) an Excel Blog

thank you very much for your great contribuation

LikeLike

Pingback: Using RC Design Functions – 3 | Newton Excel Bach, not (just) an Excel Blog

Pingback: Reinforced Concrete Moment Curvature – Development over time | Newton Excel Bach, not (just) an Excel Blog